Here’s what they do to your body.
Supporters of various intermittent fasting techniques swear by their method for everything from weight loss to cardiovascular health (though both of those claims are still being examined by scientists).
Ultimately, 16:8 may offer any slight advantages to eating normally throughout the day, but more research is needed.
People with diabetes who tried this routine versus continuous calorie restriction saw comparable control over their blood sugar and similar weight changes.
A 2016 review on studies of alternate day fasting day suggests it might be easier and more effective for fat mass loss than traditional calorie restriction.
The American Heart Association found this method less effective than alternate-day fasting for weight loss, but more studies need to be conducted overall.
This method has been researched less, but a 2009 study on eating one meal a day found that, compared to the same amount throughout the day, one meal reduced fat mass but increased blood pressure and hunger.